Updated 2 May 2019
The inspection: We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team: This inspection was carried out by one inspector.
Service and service type: The service is a 'domiciliary care agency' providing care to people living in their own homes in the community including children and adults with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder. Not everyone using Birmingham Multi-Care Support Services Ltd receives a regulated activity; The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care'; help with tasks relating to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided.
The service had a manager registered with the CQC. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection: We gave the service 24 hours' notice to ensure we would be able to access the office.
What we did: Inspection site visit activity started on 21 March 2019 and ended on 28 March 2019. We visited the office location on 21 March 2019 to see the registered manager and office staff; and to review care records and policies and procedures.
Before the inspection: We reviewed information we held about the service, to help inform us about the level of risk for this service. Providers are required to send us key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information is called a Provider Information Return and helps support our inspections. We also contacted the local safeguarding team and commissioners.
During the inspection: We reviewed two people’s care records and two medication administration records. We also looked at a selection of documentation in relation to the management and running of the service. This included quality assurance audits, complaints, accident and incident records, recruitment information for two members of staff, staff training records and policies and procedures.
We spoke with one person who used the service and two relatives. We spoke with three members of staff, a care coordinator, the deputy care services manager, the registered manager and provider’s nominated individual.