• Care Home
  • Care home

St Marys Nursing Home

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

344 Chanterlands Avenue, Hull, Humberside, HU5 4DT (01482) 307590

Provided and run by:
Private Medicare Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 8 February 2023

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.

Inspection team

One inspector and a specialist advisor carried out this inspection, and an Expert by Experience made telephone calls to people’s relatives. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type

St Mary’s Nursing Home is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

This provider is required to have a registered manager to oversee the delivery of regulated activities at this location. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers and providers are legally responsible for how the service is run, for the quality and safety of the care provided and compliance with regulations.

At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post. A new manager had been in post for three months and had applied to register. We are currently assessing this application.

Notice of inspection

This inspection was unannounced.

What we did before inspection

We reviewed information we had received about the service. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return (PIR). This is information providers are required to send us annually with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. We used all this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with the manager, deputy manager, a senior care worker, nurse, laundry assistant, head chef, 3 care assistants and an activities coordinator. We received email feedback from another care assistant. We spoke with 2 people who used the service about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with 10 relatives via telephone. We reviewed a range of records. This included 4 people’s care records and multiple medication records. We looked at 3 staff files in relation to recruitment. A variety of records relating to the management of the service were reviewed. We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

Overall inspection

Requires improvement

Updated 8 February 2023

About the service

St Mary’s Nursing Home is a residential care home providing nursing and personal care to up to 48 people aged 65 and over, younger adults and people with a physical disability. The service was supporting 32 people at the time of the inspection.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The provider had failed to ensure the ongoing maintenance of the environment which put people at increased risk of infection.

The provider had systems in place for oversight and monitoring the safety and quality of the service which under the new management had mostly resulted in improvements. The new manager and new deputy manager were aware of further improvements that were required to be made. They were open and honest and committed to making positive changes.

People’ care plans required review to ensure they were up to date and reflected people’s risk accurately. Not all care plans were up to date, followed by staff or reviewed regularly. The manager had identified this as an area for improvement and along with the deputy manager, had started reviewing these.

Staffing levels had started to improve in the service. Recruitment of new staff had been a priority for the new manager which would provide better consistency in care for people. People and relatives felt more activities were needed, and a new activities worker had started employment on the day of the inspection.

People and their relatives told us they felt safe. People were supported to remain safe. Staff knew how to report allegations and concerns of abuse and understood their roles clearly and what was expected of them. People’s medicines were managed safely. Safe recruitment and selection processes were in place.

People and relatives were getting to know the new manager. They felt they were approachable and would address any concerns they may have.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

For more details, please see the full report which is on Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 25 November 2019).

Why we inspected

The inspection was prompted in part due to concerns received about staffing levels and standards of care. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks. For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating. The overall rating for the service has changed from good to requires improvement based on the findings of this inspection.

Enforcement

We have identified a breach in relation to the environment not keeping people safe from the risk of infection, at this inspection.

Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.