Updated 14 December 2021
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.
Inspection team
Two inspectors and one medicines inspector undertook the inspection.
Service and service type
Park Grove is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.
There was no registered manager at the service at the time of the inspection. The previous manager who was applying to be registered manager had recently left. The provider told us they were in the process of recruiting a new manager who would be applying to the Care Quality Commission to be registered manager. This means that they and the provider would be legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
This inspection was unannounced.
What we did before the inspection
Prior to the inspection we looked at all of the information we held about the service. This included feedback and notifications which the provider is required to send to us by law. We also asked for feedback from professionals about their experience of the service.
The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with five people who used the service and undertook phone calls with permission to four relatives. We also spoke with one professional visiting the service on the day of the inspection and received feedback from another three professionals. We looked at a number of records, these included four staff files, two care files and records relating to the operation and management of the service. We reviewed five medicine administration records and looked at medicines related documentation. We also spoke with six staff, these included, care staff, housekeeping, the deputy manager and the nominated individual. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider.
After the inspection
The service continued to provide evidence to support the inspection.