• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Southlands & Anchor House Extra Care

Broadfield Road, Knowle, Bristol, BS4 2UG (0117) 971 9771

Provided and run by:
Brunelcare

All Inspections

25 July 2014

During a routine inspection

This inspection was carried out by an adult social care inspector. At the time of inspection the agency was providing care and support to 44 people who lived in their own flats. The purpose of our inspection was to answer these key questions; Is the service caring? Is the service responsive? Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service well led?

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our observations during the inspection, speaking with people using the service, their relatives, the staff supporting them and from looking at records.

If you want to see the evidence supporting our summary please read the full report.

Is the service safe?

People we spoke with told us that they felt safe with the staff who visited their homes and had no concerns about how care staff treated them. One person told us "I feel absolutely safe". We saw that care staff carried identification. Staff we spoke with told us they always wore this when they visited people to help protect people from unauthorised visitors.

We saw that risk assessments had been put in place and included guidance to reduce risks that may be associated with administration of medicines or people's moving and handling needs. We also saw assessments had been carried out for people where there were risks associated with their care which could impact on their health and safety. For example, some people were at risk of falling because of their mobility. This meant care staff had the necessary information and advice to ensure people's safety and welfare.

Is the service effective?

There were systems in place that included regular checks to monitor staff practices and the experiences of people who received a service. For example, we found that team leaders observed care staff practices, and sought the views from people to ensure that they were satisfied with their care. We were told by some staff that any issues from these monitoring checks were raised with staff.This meant that the agency had arrangements in place to monitor the quality of their services to ensure that all aspects of the care people received were being delivered effectively.

Is the service caring?

We spoke with eight people who received a service from the agency. People told us that they were aware of the care plan and the care they were receiving. They told us that they were supported by regular staff who understood that people had different preferences in relation to their care.

People were positive about the support they had received. One person told us: 'the staff are very kind and caring they do everything I want them to do". Another person said "they are always kind to me and they really do care".

Is the service responsive?

We spoke with care staff about the needs of people that they supported. The care staff we spoke with had an understanding of the needs of the people they supported and what they needed to do to meet them. Care staff also understood of how to recognise when someone needed additional support or referral to other services. For example arranging doctor's visit, the social services and emergency services. This meant the service people received was responsive to their needs.

Is the service well-led?

People who used the service were asked for their views about their care and support and they were acted on. Some of the comments from the survey sent out to the people who used the service included 'the care I receive is excellent, it has helped me to stay in my home in Southlands'. Another comment was "they are all so pleasant and always spend the complete time with me and do a good job'.

There were systems in place that included regular checks to monitor staff practices. For example, we found that team leaders observed care staff practices, and sought the views from people to ensure that they were satisfied with their care. We were told by some staff that any issues from these monitoring checks were raised with them.This meant that the agency had arrangements in place to monitor the quality of their services to ensure that all aspects of the care people received were being delivered well.

18 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three people who lived at Southlands and Anchor.

They told us they were provided with support when they needed it and they valued the security that living at Southlands and Anchor provided them. One person told us moving to Southlands and Anchor had made a difference to their everyday living as staff were, 'on site if you need someone for any support" which they said was reassuring.

People told us that they were treated with respect and that staff maintained their privacy and dignity. People described how they were supported where needed or checked on by care staff to make sure they were safe and well.

They told us that staff had got to know them well and understood their routines. This meant that people received care in the way they preferred. We were also told by people that staff knocked and used their door bells before entering their homes.

We saw that people received care and support that was flexible to their needs. We looked at the care records of three people who used the service. We saw that an assessment of people's needs was carried out before the service started. This was reviewed when people's needs had changed. One person told us that they had been ill recently and the extra support that they received helped them to recover from their illness and regain their independence.

People we spoke with were confident that they could raise concerns if they were not happy with the support they received and that they would be listened to.

5 October 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with nineteen people receiving a service, three members of staff and the manager during our visit. We also spoke with one person living at Anchor House, two relatives and one social care professional over the phone.

People using the service told us they liked living in Southlands and Anchor House Extra Housing, they said they were happy with the services provided by Brunelcare and that staff were supportive and friendly. They said that they had a choice of how to spend their day and that the agency supported them with various options of activities. One person said 'there quite a lot of activities but I rarely go because my family take me out most of the time. I am very content and happy'. People told us they felt safe and well supported by the staff working in the home. One person said 'overall I am happy here. I used to have sleepless nights before I came here but now I sleep like a log. Staff call me every morning on the intercom to make sure I am ok'.

One individual said that a copy of their care file was kept at their home so they were able to look at it any time and that they were involved in decisions about their care. People told us that they were aware of the complaints procedure but had no complaints.

We observed staff interacting with people in a dignified and personalised manner.