• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Warrington Road

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

102-108 Warrington Road, Halton View, Widnes, Cheshire, WA8 0AS (0151) 423 3621

Provided and run by:
Scope

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

2 May 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 2 May 2017 and was unannounced. On the 11 May 2017 we contacted people’s relatives by telephone to seek their views about the service. At the last inspection in June 2015, we found the service met all the regulations we looked at and was rated as good.

102 – 108 Warrington Road is a purpose built care home providing personal care and accommodation for up to 12 people who have a physical disability. The service consists of four linked bungalows each accommodating three people. The home is located in a residential area of Widnes and is within easy access of the local amenities. The property is owned by a housing trust and managed by Scope. At the time of the inspection there were 12 people living at the service.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found that people and their relatives were positive and complimentary about the support they received from the service. People lived in a comfortable environment and indicated they were happy and well treated.

We found that there had previously been some shortfalls in the safe management of medicines. A recent medication audit had highlighted some areas of good practice but also a number of areas where improvements were required. The service had been working on some of these issues and had taken immediate action to address these . We recommend that the service continues to monitor closely to ensure that these improvements are sustained.

Staff knew how to protect people from the risk of abuse or harm. They followed appropriate guidance to minimise identified risks to people's health, safety and welfare. Staffing levels had recently been increased and there were enough staff to keep people safe.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. The service was compliant with The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005). Staff received appropriate training and were supported by the registered manager through supervision and meetings, to enable them to meet people's needs effectively. Staff who had transferred had been included within the training matrix and the management were working to ensure that training and competency assessments were refreshed for these staff over the next few weeks.

People’s preferences around food were respected and drinks were offered throughout the day, with people being given choices about their drinks. People were also encouraged to make healthy choices. We found that staff had a good understanding about people’s nutritional needs and that instructions and guidance were detailed within their support plans.

People told us that they were well cared for. A number of staff had worked at the service for several years and had developed effective relationships with the people they supported.. It was evident from the discussions we had with people who used the service that they were treated with respect and dignity.

We found that people were involved in deciding how the care and support staff were to help them. Staff told us people and their families were involved in discussions about their care. Details about supporting people to be part of decision making were included in people’s support plans and people told us they felt involved in making decisions.

People received care that was personalised and responsive to their needs. We saw that assessments of people's needs had been completed prior to them using the service and this information had been used to develop their support plans. People’s goals and aspirations were considered as part of the support planning. The service promoted inclusion and supported people to take part in activities which reflected their interests.

The service had a complaints procedure in place and the registered manager kept an electronic record of any complaints received and how they had been dealt with. People spoken with told us that they felt able to raise any concerns should they need to and knew how they could go about this.

We found that the service was well-led. Staff were motivated and positive about the management of the service and told us that they could approach the registered manager with any concerns. The registered manager told us they were keen to continue to improve the service and were working towards a service improvement plan. We found that staff had a good understanding of their roles and responsibilities. Quality assurance systems were in place to monitor the service.

23 and 24 March 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection was unannounced and took place on the 23 March 2015. A second day of the inspection took place on the 24 March 2015 in order to gather additional information.

The home was previously inspected in August 2013 when it was found to be meeting all the regulatory requirements which were inspected at that time.

Warrington Road is a purpose built care home located in Widnes. It offers accommodation and personal care for up to 12 people who have a physical disability. At the time of our inspection the service was providing accommodation and care to 11 people.

The service consists of four bungalows, each of which accommodates three people. Each bungalow is fully adapted to meet the needs of people with a physical disability and is equipped with a lounge, three bedrooms, laundry room, dining and kitchen area, shower facility and bathroom. The service is located within easy access of the local amenities. The home is owned by a housing trust and managed by Scope.

At the time of the inspection there was a registered manager at Warrington Road. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

During the two days of our inspection, people living at Warrington Road were observed to be comfortable and relaxed in their home environment and in the presence of staff.

The registered manager and staff spoken with demonstrated a good awareness of the diverse needs and preferences of the people living at Warrington Road and how best to provide person centred care and support for people. Staff were seen to be patient, respectful and caring when communicating and interacting with the people they cared for. It was clear through facial expressions, gestures and / or verbal responses that the people using the service were comfortable and happy in the presence of staff.

People using the service and relatives spoken with were complimentary of the standard of care provided at Warrington Road.

Comments received from people using the service included: “They [staff] have on-going training, they’re skilled and experienced enough to support me”; “The key worker system is effective and sorts everything out”; “All the staff are approachable and friendly, it wouldn’t work if they weren’t.”

Staff confirmed they had access to a range of induction, mandatory and other training that was relevant to their individual roles and responsibilities. Staff spoken with also reported that they had received supervision, observations and appraisals at regular intervals.

We saw that there were corporate policies and procedures in place relating to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberties (DoLS). This helped to safeguard the rights of the people using the service. At the time of our visit none of the people using the service lacked capacity.

We found that the provider had established a range of methods to assess the quality of the service provided to people. These included audits on areas such as the care files, individual finances and staff training.

2 August 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with eight of the ten people living in the home; they told us that they liked living there and that the staff members supporting them were good. Comments included; 'I like it here' and 'Everything is fine.'

Menus and shopping for food were planned and undertaken with the people who lived in each bungalow. This was done by discussing likes/dislikes and what people felt like eating. This provided a very flexible menu for people.

We saw that policies and procedures were in place to help ensure that people's medication was being managed appropriately and we did not identify any concerns with the system in place and any medication being administered was being given as prescribed.

We did not have any concerns regarding either the numbers or suitability of the staff members working at the home.

Information about the quality of service provided was gathered on a continuous and on-going basis with direct feedback from the people using the service.

17 January 2013

During a routine inspection

The people who used the service said that they were happy living in the home and that the staff members supporting them were very good. One of the people who used the service told us, 'The staff look after me well', another person said, 'I am happy here.'

During our inspection we saw there was good communication and understanding between the members of staff and the people who were receiving care and support from them. We observed people being supported with their daily life activities for example helping to plan a holiday. The people we met with appeared relaxed, comfortable and at ease with the staff. It was evident staff had a good understanding of what was important to each person, for example, preferred clothes, preferred meals and social arrangements.

Information about the safety and quality of service provided was gathered on a continuous and ongoing basis with feedback from the people who used the service.

The staff members we spoke to were very positive about the home and how it was being managed. One of them told us, 'I really enjoy my job and the service is very well managed.'

25 January 2012

During a routine inspection

We were accompanied by an expert by experience on this visit. The expert concluded: 'In summary, I feel the properties demonstrate a very good example how personalised support that promotes realistic independent living can be provided within a regulated environment for a generation of disabled people where their life experiences would make full independent living unrealistic. I did not observe anything which raised any concerns'.

The expert by experience noted that people who could only communicate non verbally did not give any impression of any concerns about the service and appeared to be satisfied with the support they received.

We spoke with a number of people. They commented:

'We get privacy and are respected by staff'

'I feel safe'

'I know exactly what is in my care plan'

'Staff are very good and they listen to me'

'Staff always act on what I say'

'staff listen to us'

'Their support is very personal'

'I am happy here'

'It is great'

'There are always enough staff here both day and night'