Archived: The Bungalow

Updated 14 April 2016

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection checked whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 15 February 2016 and was unannounced. The inspection was carried out by one adult social care inspector from the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

Before the inspection we reviewed the previous inspection report and notifications we received from the service. We also contacted the local authority commissioners and other professional bodies to seek their views about the service. They told us they had no concerns regarding The Bungalow.

During the inspection we spoke with all the staff on duty three people who used the service, a relative and the district nurse, the cook and the provider. We did this to gain their views about the service provided. We looked around the home and people invited us look in their bedrooms. We looked at three care plans, three staff personnel files, medication records and records about the management of the home.

Updated 14 April 2016

This inspection took place on 15 February 2016 and was unannounced. The Bungalow is in the Farnworth area of Bolton and is close to local amenities and public transport. The home is registered to provide residential care for 19 people. Parking is available at the front of the home. There is an enclosed garden at the rear of the home.

We last inspected this service in October 2013. At that inspection we found the service was meeting all the regulations we reviewed.

The provider of the service was also the manager registered. A registered manager is a person who has registered with CQC to manage the service. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager oversees two other homes. The registered manager was available to assist with the inspection with the support of the senior carer.

gap

Staff spoken with were able to demonstrate their understanding of the whistle-blowing procedure and knew what to do if an allegation of abuse was made to them or if they suspected that abuse had occurred.

We found the people were cared for by sufficient numbers of suitably skilled and experienced staff who were safely recruited. We saw that staff had received essential training and support to enable them to do their job effectively and care for people safely.

People who used the service told us they felt staff had the skills and experience to meet their needs. People we spoke with told us they felt safe living at the home and spoke positively about the kindness and caring attitude of the staff.

We found that systems for managing medicines were safe and we saw how staff worked in cooperation with other healthcare professionals to ensure that people received appropriate care and treatment.

We saw that risk assessments were in place for the management of the safety of the premises. All areas of the home were clean and well maintained. Procedures were in place to prevent and control the spread of infection.

Systems were in place to deal with any emergency that could affect the provision of care such as a failure of the electricity or gas supply.

People’s care records contained enough information to guide staff on the care and support required. The care records showed that risks to people’s health and well-being had been identified and plans were in place to eliminate the risk. People and their relatives (where appropriate) were involved and consulted about the development of their care plans. This helped to ensure the wishes of people who used the service were considered and planned for.

We saw that appropriate arrangements were in place to assess whether people were able to consent to their care and treatment. We found the provider was meeting the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS); these provide legal safeguards for people who may be unable to make their own decisions

Staff spoken with had a good understanding of the care and support that people required. We saw that people looked well cared for and there was enough equipment to promote people’s safety and independence.

Food stocks were good and the meals provided were varied and nutritious. People we spoke with told us the food was good and there was plenty of it.

We saw that a basic system was in place to monitor and assess the quality of the service provided.

The registered manager spent time at the home two or three days a week and held a ‘manager’s surgery’ should anyone wish to meet with her.