18 February 2019
During a routine inspection
St Stephen’s Care Home (St Stephen’s) is a ‘care home’ providing care and accommodation for up to 40 older people. The premises are on one level and divided into two units, one of which provides support to people living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 37 people living at the home.
At the last inspection we rated the service Good. At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the rating of Good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection. At this inspection we found the service remained Good.
People continued to receive a safe service and were protected from harm and abuse. Medicines were managed and administered safely. Accidents and incidents were recorded and management had oversight to identify developing patterns to mitigate the risk of recurrence. Although we received contrasting feedback about staffing levels, during the inspection we observed that there were sufficient staff to meet people’s needs. Safety checks were carried out to ensure St Stephen’s was a safe place to live. Measures were in place to control and prevent the spread of infection.
People continued to receive an effective service. People’s needs were assessed before they came to live at St Stephen’s. Staff received a wide range of health and social care related training. Regular staff supervision and appraisal took place. Staff competency was checked. Food was served in line with people’s dietary needs. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
People continued to receive a caring service. People’s privacy, dignity and independence were promoted and they were treated fairly and without discrimination. People’s individual communication needs were considered. We observed kind, caring and patient staff practice.
People continued to receive a responsive service. The service was homely and person-centred. People’s preferences and needs were recorded in a personalised care plan. A new system of care planning had been introduced including a more robust process for review. There was a policy and procedure in place to manage and respond to complaints. People’s future wishes for end of life care were considered and the service followed the ‘Six Steps’ programme to ensure high quality care at this stage of life.
People continued to receive a service that was well-led. There was a well-developed performance framework to assess the safety and quality of the service. Measures were in place to continuously improve the service. There was a registered manager in post who was due to leave however a new manager had been recruited. The regional manager would be responsible for overseeing their induction to facilitate a smooth transition.
We have made a recommendation that the registered provider reviews access to records to ensure that they are available in the absence of the registered manager.
Further information is in the detailed findings below