• Care Home
  • Care home

Belchford

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Hesleden Road, Hesleden, Hartlepool, Cleveland, TS27 4PB (01429) 836286

Provided and run by:
Voyage 1 Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Belchford on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Belchford, you can give feedback on this service.

29 March 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Belchford is a residential care home providing personal to up to 7 people. The service provides support to people living with a learning disability and/or autism. At the time of our inspection there were 7 people using the service.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Right Support:

Staff had supported people for a significant amount of time and knew their needs well. Staff supported people to engage in activities and to access the community. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Right Care:

Staff supported people to make daily living choices. People had developed positive relationships with staff supporting them. Staff treated people with dignity and respect.

Right Culture:

The registered manager knew the service and people well. The registered manager and staff aimed to instill a person-centred culture which focused on the needs of people using the service. The registered manager was committed to on-going improvement.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for the service was good, published on 28 November 2017.

Why we inspected

This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Belchford on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

19 October 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 19 October 2017 and was unannounced. This meant the staff and the provider did not know we would be visiting. Belchford was last inspected by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) on 29 September 2015 and was rated Good. At this inspection we found the service remained Good.

Belchford is a detached, two storey building set in its own grounds. The service comprised of seven single bedrooms, none of which were en-suite. The accommodation included a lounge, a kitchen, a dining room, several communal bathrooms/toilets and the property was surrounded by a large, enclosed garden.

The service provides care and accommodation for up to seven people with a learning disability and complex needs. On the day of our inspection there were seven people using the service.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People who used the service and their relatives were complimentary about the standard of care at Belchford. Relatives and staff said the registered manager was approachable and supportive.

There were sufficient numbers of staff on duty in order to meet the needs of people who used the service. The provider had an effective recruitment and selection procedure in place and carried out relevant checks when they employed staff.

Staff were suitably trained and received regular supervisions and appraisals.

Medicines were managed safely and procedures were in place to ensure people received medicines as prescribed.

Accidents and incidents were appropriately recorded and investigated. Risk assessments were in place for people who used the service. They described potential risks and the safeguards in place to mitigate these risks.

The registered manager understood their responsibilities with regard to safeguarding and staff had been trained in safeguarding vulnerable adults.

The provider carried out regular health and safety checks. Procedures were in place to deal with emergency situations.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People had opportunities to participate in their preferred activities in the service and within the local community.

Care records were person-centred and reflective of people’s needs. People were protected from the risk of poor nutrition and staff were aware of people’s nutritional needs.

Relatives were aware of how to make a complaint but did not have any complaints about the service.

The provider had an effective system of quality assurance checks to ensure people received a good standard of care.

29 September 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 29 September 2015 and was unannounced. This meant the staff and the provider did not know we would be visiting.

Belchford is a detached, two storey building set in its own grounds. The home comprised of seven single bedrooms, none of which were en-suite. Four bedrooms were located on the ground floor and three bedrooms were located on the first floor. The accommodation included a lounge, a kitchen, a dining room, several bathrooms/communal toilets and the property was surrounded by a large, enclosed, well maintained garden.

The home was clean, spacious and suitable for the people who used the service.

Belchford provides care and accommodation for up to seven people with a learning disability and complex needs. On the day of our inspection there were seven people using the service.

The home had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Belchford was last inspected by CQC on 13 January 2013 and was compliant with the regulations in force at the time.

There were sufficient numbers of staff on duty in order to meet the needs of people using the service. The provider had an effective recruitment and selection procedure in place and carried out relevant checks when they employed staff.

Incidents and accidents were appropriately recorded and included details of any follow up action taken.

Medicines were administered safely and there was an effective medicines ordering system in place.

Staff training was up to date and staff received regular supervisions and appraisals.

CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which applies to care homes. The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) are part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. They aim to make sure that people in care homes, hospitals and supported living are looked after in a way that does not inappropriately restrict their freedom. We looked at records and discussed DoLS with the registered manager who told us that there were DoLS in place and in the process of being applied for.

People who used the service and their relatives were complimentary about the standard of care at Belchford.

Staff treated people with dignity and respect and helped to maintain people’s independence by encouraging them to care for themselves where possible.

People who used the service had access to a range of activities in the home and within the local community.

Care records were person-centred and reflective of people’s needs.

The provider had a complaints policy and procedure in place and complaints were fully investigated.

The provider had a robust quality assurance system in place and gathered information about the quality of their service from a variety of sources.

13 January 2014

During a routine inspection

The arrangements for supporting people to make decisions and consent to any care, treatment and support they received were in place. We saw people were supported to take appropriate risks to promote their independence.

We saw evidence how the provider co-operated with other providers to protect the health, welfare and safety of people who used the service.

We saw the relationships people who used the service had with the staff who supported them were good. All personal support they received protected their privacy and dignity. The majority of people had some difficulty in verbal communications. However each person's care plan held detailed information about their individual communication methods and skills such as, signs, gestures and facial expressions and what these meant for each person.

The recruitment records demonstrated all appropriate checks were in place before an employee commenced work at the home.

The records we looked at showed us people were cared for and supported by suitably trained staff to deliver care, treatment and support safely and to an appropriate standard.

We found suitable arrangement were in place for handling concerns and complaints.

4 September 2012

During a routine inspection

During the inspection people, as a result of their communication needs, could not tell us what they thought about the service provided. Therefore we spent time observing staff practices and talking to staff about the people they supported. The staff we talked with clearly knew about the needs of the people who used the service. We saw they treated people with dignity and respect. People were comfortable and relaxed and we saw them interacting with staff in a positive way.

We looked at the annual surveys people had completed comments included, 'I am very happy with the way my son is looked after and he is very happy there.'

'My son is very happy, all the staff are wonderful.'

Two professional's said the care was excellent.