• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Moormead Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

67 Moormead Road, Wroughton, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN4 9BU (01793) 814259

Provided and run by:
Mr S Sharp

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 16 December 2020

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

As part of CQC’s response to the coronavirus pandemic we are conducting a thematic review of infection control and prevention measures in care homes.

The service was selected to take part in this thematic review which is seeking to identify examples of good practice in infection prevention and control.

This inspection took place on 26/11/2020 and was announced.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 16 December 2020

We undertook an unannounced inspection of Moormead Care Home on 23 March 2018

Moormead Care Home is a nursing care home registered to provide accommodation for up to 21 people. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection'. On the day of our inspection, 19 people were being supported and one person was in hospital. The care home is located in Wroughton near Swindon. The service had been registered in March 2000 and is privately owned.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the previous inspection in 2016 the service was rated Good overall. At this inspection we found the service had remained Good overall.

People and their relatives complimented the compassionate nature of staff and told us staff were caring. On the day of our inspection we saw examples of kind and compassionate interactions that demonstrated staff knew people well. People's dignity, privacy and confidentiality were respected.

People told us they were safe. Staff knew what to do if they had safeguarding concerns and were aware of the provider's whistle blowing policy. People were supported by sufficient staff to keep them safe and the provider ensured safe recruitment practices were followed. Staff training was ongoing and the records confirmed staff received supervisions.

People's care plans contained risk assessments that covered areas such as falls, mobility or nutrition. Where people were at risk, their records outlined management plans on how to keep them safe.

People's medicines were stored securely and administered safely by trained staff.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required by law to monitor the operation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and report on what we find. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were supported to maintain good health and access health professionals when required.

People were complimentary about the food, and they were provided with choices at every meal.

People were assessed prior to coming to live at Moormead Care Home and people told us staff knew them well.

People's care files gave details of the level of support required and people's wishes and choices. These also contained information about people's personal histories, medical information, their likes and dislikes.

Information on how to complain was available to people and the provider had a complaints policy in place.

The registered manager ensured various audits were being carried out, where improvements were identified we found evidence that these had been carried out.

We saw that the service had an established and stable team that worked cohesively, supported each other and were well-supported by the registered manager. All staff we spoke to were committed to putting the needs of people first and providing a homely environment for people.