21 May 2018
During a routine inspection
At our last inspection on 8 September 2016 we found improvements were needed in how incidents which had occurred were recorded and reported and how action was taken to prevent further incidents. At this inspection we found the provider had made the required improvements.
This service provides care and support to people living in eight ‘supported living’ settings, so that they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.
There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People were protected from abuse and risks were assessed and planned for to keep people safe. Premises and equipment were maintained to minimise the risk of infection. People were supported by sufficient safely recruited staff. Medicines were managed and administered safely. The registered manager had systems in place to learn when things went wrong.
People’s needs were assessed and effective care plans were in place. Staff received training to support people with effective and consistent care. People were able to choose what they had to eat and drink and were supported safely. People had support to maintain their health and wellbeing. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
People were supported by staff that were kind and caring and had good relationships with people. People had their communication needs assessed and care plans were in place which supported people to make choices and retain their independence. People were treated with dignity and respect.
People’s preferences were understood by staff, assessments and care plans considered diverse needs and how to meet them. Reviews of people’s care needs were undertaken and people were supported to follow their interests. People could make a complaint and there was a system in place to investigate these. People had their wishes for end of life care considered.
People and their relatives were involved in the service and were asked for feedback. We found systems in place to check on the quality of the service people received and the provider used information from these to make improvements. The registered manager had systems in place to monitor the delivery of people’s care.