• Dentist
  • Dentist

Bracken Dental Practice

Unit5 Belle Vale Shopping Centre, Belle Vale, Liverpool, Lancashire, L25 2RF (0151) 488 6226

Provided and run by:
Dr. Joseph Peter Bracken

All Inspections

15June 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced inspection on 15 June 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we asked the following three questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Bracken Dental Practice is located in Belle Vale shopping centre, Liverpool, and provides largely NHS dental care and treatment for adults and children. Some private treatment is available.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available in the shopping centre car park. There is lift access from the car park to the shopping mall unit that the practice occupies.

The dental team includes three dentists, three dental nurses, a receptionist and a practice manager. The practice has two treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with two dentists, two dental nurses, a receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday from 9am to 5.30pm and on Thursday from 9am to 7pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to review Legionella risk, taking into account the guidelines issued by the Department of Health in the Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices, and having regard to The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance.’ In particular, that any assessment carried out considers the specific needs of a dental practice.
  • Improve the practice's protocols and procedures for the use of X-ray equipment in compliance with The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017 and Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 and taking into account the guidance for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-ray Equipment. In particular, to act on recommendations made in the Radiation Protection Advisor’s report of January 2019.

11/01/2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 11 January 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

We told the NHS England Cheshire and Merseyside area team that we were inspecting the practice. We did not receive any information of concern from them.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Bracken Dental Practice is in a suburb of Liverpool and provides dental care and treatment to adults and children on an NHS and privately funded basis.

There is level access to facilitate entrance to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and for pushchairs. The practice has two treatment rooms. Car parking is available near the practice.

The dental team includes three dentists, four dental nurses and two receptionists. The team is supported by a practice manager.

The practice is owned by an individual. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

We received feedback from 48 people during the inspection about the services provided. The feedback provided was positive about the practice.

During the inspection we spoke to two dentists, dental nurses, receptionists and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies, procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday and Tuesday 9.00am to 6.00pm

Wednesday 9.00am to 5.30pm

Thursday 9.00am to 5.00pm

Friday 9.00am to 3.30pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was clean and well maintained.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medical emergency medicines and equipment were available.
  • The practice had infection control procedures in place which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children and the practice had processes in place to guide them.
  • Staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The appointment system took patients’ needs into account. Dedicated emergency appointments were available.
  • The practice had a procedure in place for dealing with complaints. Details of alternative organisations patients could complain to were not available.
  • The practice had a leadership structure. Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked patients and staff for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice had systems in place to help them manage risk. We found that not all reasonably practicable measures to reduce risk had been put in place in relation to sharps and Legionella.
  • The practice had staff recruitment procedures in place. References were not obtained for staff prior to employment.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the protocol for maintaining accurate, complete and detailed records relating to the employment of staff. This includes ensuring references, are obtained and suitably recorded.
  • Review the practice’s systems for assessing, monitoring and mitigating the various risks arising from undertaking of the regulated activities, specifically in relation to Legionella, the responsibility for dismantling all used sharps, and the damaged operator’s chair.
  • Review the practice’s complaint handling procedures to ensure information about organisations patients can contact, for example NHS England, are available should they not wish to complain to the practice directly or should they not be satisfied with the way the practice dealt with their concerns.

25 October 2012

During a routine inspection

On arrival we found people being welcomed in a friendly and polite manner.

We spoke with four people who were attending the dental practice for an appointment. They told us that they felt their privacy and dignity had been respected, and they would be happy to raise a concern. They told us, "Best I've ever been to", "Makes you feel comfortable and "Can't say anything wrong"

The decontamination room and the reception had undergone improvement but other parts of the practice were in need of some renovation. We discussed some environmental issues with the provider which they noted and advised us of remedial action. Each room was fully equipped and we observed staff carrying out cleaning procedures in between the treatment of each patient, thus minimising the risk of cross infection.

We found dental records had been completed in respect of patient examination, assessments, treatment planning and following advice they had been given. We also saw that patient's personal and medical history had been updated regularly.

We saw evidence of compliance with the practice quality assurance processes to ensure there were effective systems in place.