Background to this inspection
Updated
5 August 2016
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
This inspection took place on the 21 and 23 June 2016 and was announced. The provider was given a short period of noticed because the location provides a domiciliary care service and we needed to be sure that someone would be in.
Before the inspection, the provider completed a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.
The inspection was carried out by an adult social care inspector. Prior to the inspection we contacted the local authority safeguarding and quality monitoring teams who did not raise any concerns around the service.
During the inspection we used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us. We spoke with eight people using the service and two people’s relatives. We looked at six people’s care records, three recruitment records and other records relating to the management of the service. We spoke with six members of staff including the registered manager, and one visiting professional.
Updated
5 August 2016
The inspection took place on the 21 and 23 June 2016 and was announced. The service was last inspected in March 2014, and was found to be meeting those standards we looked at.
The service provides domiciliary care support and support to people within an extra care setting. This is where support is delivered to people within their own flat. The service operates across three different sites within St Helens. At the time of the inspection there were 56 people receiving care and support from the service.
There service had a manager who had been registered with the CQC since March 2014. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
There were sufficient numbers of staff available to meet people’s needs. People told us that there were sufficient staff to respond to emergencies and that staff had time to talk with them. Staffing rotas confirmed that staffing levels were consistent.
People were protected from the risk of abuse. Staff had undertaken training in safeguarding vulnerable people and knew how to report any concerns they may have, inside and outside the organisation.
People were supported to take their medicines as prescribed. Staff had received training in the safe management of medicines and received routine checks to ensure they were competent to do so. Medicines audits were carried out by the registered manager, and any issues identified were followed up and remedial action taken.
Staff had received training that ensured they had the appropriate skills and knowledge to carry out their roles effectively. The registered manager kept a record of staff training to ensure their skills and knowledge were up-to-date.
Care records contained information around people’s dietary requirements. This ensured that staff were aware of any support people may need during meal times. We observed examples where staff offered appropriate support to those people who needed it whilst they were eating their meals.
Staff were kind and respectful towards people. People told us that they had developed a good relationship with staff, and spoke very highly of them, commenting that they were “friendly”, and made them feel at ease. This helped ensure the development of positive relationships.
People’s confidentiality was respected. Care records that contained personal information were stored in a secure cabinet within a locked office.
People received personalised care and support. Care records contained details around people’s likes, dislikes and life history. There was also detailed information around their care and support needs, and how staff should respond to meet these needs. This ensured that staff had access to relevant information to allow them to provide the correct level of support.
The registered provider had a complaints policy in place which people were familiar with. People told us they knew how to make a complaint, and who to raise any concerns with. They also told us they felt confident their concerns would be listened to. The complaints procedure was available in the different schemes, and people received a copy of this information when they first started using the service.
People spoke positively about the service and the registered manager. Staff told us that they felt well supported and were aware of the management structure within the different schemes. Staff were encouraged to make suggestions around ways of improving the service, and there was an incentive scheme in place around this.
The registered provider and the registered manager both completed quality monitoring checks of the service on a routine basis. These focussed on areas such as care plans, medication and staff knowledge of key areas such as safeguarding. At the last quality monitoring check completed by the registered provider the service scored 90% which resulted in staff receiving a bonus.