Background to this inspection
Updated
22 March 2018
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
This inspection was announced and carried out by one inspector. The provider was given up to 48 hours’ notice because it is a small service and we wanted to be certain the registered managers and key staff would be available on the day of our inspection. We also wanted to give them sufficient time to make arrangements with people so that we could visit them in their homes to find out their experience of the service.
Inspection site visit activity started on 31 January 2018 and ended on 6 February 2018. The inspector visited the office location on 31 January 2018 to see the registered managers and support workers, and to review care records and policies and procedures. The inspector visited seven people and two relatives in their own homes on 31 January 2018, to find out their experience of using the service. Telephone interviews by the inspector were carried out 1 February 2018 to 6 February 2018.
Before the inspection, we requested that the provider complete a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. This was received from the provider. We also reviewed information we held about the service including feedback sent to us from other stakeholders, for example the local authority and members of the public. Providers are required to notify the Care Quality Commission (CQC) about events and incidents that occur including unexpected deaths, injuries to people receiving care and safeguarding matters. We reviewed the notifications the provider had sent us.
As part of this inspection we reviewed the responses from questionnaires sent out by CQC to people who used the service, staff, family and relatives.
We spoke with the two registered managers, two team managers and five support workers. With their permission we met with seven people and two relatives in their own homes on 31 January 2018. We carried out telephone interviews with three relatives. In addition we received comments about the service provided from three community professionals.
We reviewed the care records of four people to check they were receiving their care as planned. We looked at records relating to the management of the service, staff recruitment and training, and systems for monitoring the quality of the service.
Updated
22 March 2018
South Suffolk Support Living and Domiciliary provides care and support to people living in two ‘supported living’ settings, so that they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support. South Suffolk Support Living and Domiciliary also provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats.
At the time of this announced inspection of 31 January 2018 there were 11 people who used the service. Seven people were living in ‘supported living’ settings and four people received domiciliary care in their own homes. The provider was given up to 48 hours’ notice because it is a small service and we wanted to be certain the registered managers and key staff would be available on the day of our inspection. We also wanted to give them sufficient time to seek agreements with people so that we could visit them in their homes to find out their experience of the service. This service was registered with CQC on 15 December 2016.
Two registered managers were in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People and their relatives were complimentary about the service provided and the approach of the support workers. They told us that they were kind, compassionate and respectful towards them. They described how they received safe and effective care by support workers they trusted, who understood their needs and encouraged them to be as independent as possible.
The leadership team were a visible presence which meant that support workers were aware of the values of the provider and understood their roles and responsibilities. Morale was good within the workforce.
People were safe and support workers knew what actions to take to protect them from abuse. The provider had processes in place to identify and manage risk. People’s care needs were assessed, planned for and delivered to achieve positive outcomes. These were regularly reviewed and reflected individual needs and preferences.
Recruitment checks were carried out with sufficient numbers of support workers employed who had the knowledge and skills through regular supervision and training to meet people’s needs.
Where people required assistance with their medications, safe systems were followed. Support workers were provided with training in infection control and food hygiene and understood their responsibilities relating to these areas. Systems were in place to reduce the risks of cross infection.
Where support workers had identified concerns in people’s wellbeing there were systems in place to contact health and social care professionals to make sure they received appropriate care and treatment. Where required, people were safely supported with their dietary needs.
People, and or, their representatives, where appropriate, were involved in making decisions about their care and support arrangements. As a result people received care and support which was planned and delivered to meet their specific needs.
Support workers listened to people and acted on what they said. They understood the need to obtain consent when providing care. They had completed training in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). Procedures and guidance in relation to the MCA were followed which included steps that the provider should take to comply with legal requirements.
There was a complaints procedure in place and people knew how to voice their concerns if they were unhappy with the care they received. People’s feedback was valued and acted on.