Gwynne Dental Ltd

On this page

• Overview
• Learning culture
• Safe systems, pathways and transitions
• Safeguarding
• Involving people to manage risks
• Safe environments
• Safe and effective staffing
• Infection prevention and control
• Medicines optimisation

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations and had taken into consideration appropriate guidance.

Find out what we look at when we assess this area in our information about our new Single assessment framework.

The judgement for Learning culture is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Safe key question.

The judgement for Safe systems, pathways and transitions is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Safe key question.

The judgement for Safeguarding is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Safe key question.

The judgement for Involving people to manage risks is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Safe key question.

The practice had processes to identify and manage risks and staff we spoke with were able to describe these to us. Staff felt confident that risks were well managed at the practice, and this was reflected in our findings. The premises were visibly clean, well maintained and free from clutter. Improvements could be made to ensure that cleaning equipment was stored separately to reduce the risk of cross contamination and cleaning standard checks were recorded appropriately. This shortfall has been addressed. Emergency equipment and medicines were available and checked in accordance with national guidance. Staff could access these in a timely way. Staff knew how to respond to a medical emergency and had completed training in emergency resuscitation and basic life support every year. Improvement was needed to ensure that all hazardous substances were risk assessed appropriately, their storage areas were labelled and secure to prevent unauthorised interference and safety data sheets were available for everyone working at the practice. This shortfall has been addressed. We saw satisfactory records of servicing and validation of equipment in line with manufacturer’s instructions. We noted that a fire risk assessment had been carried out the day before our visit. We were told this was part of the refurbishment works we could see that were underway. The practice had systems for appropriate and safe handling of medicines. Antimicrobial prescribing audits were carried out. A lone working risk assessment had not been carried out for the hygienist who did not have chairside support and the cleaner who worked when the practice was closed. This shortfall has been addressed.

The practice had a recruitment policy and procedures that reflected relevant legislation, to help them employ suitable staff, including agency or locum staff. The practice ensured clinical staff were qualified, registered with the General Dental Council and had appropriate professional indemnity cover. Newly appointed staff had an appropriate role specific structured induction. Staff we spoke with had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles. They told us that there were sufficient staffing levels. They demonstrated knowledge of safeguarding and were aware of how safeguarding information could be accessed. Staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children. The practice had arrangements to ensure staff training, including continuing professional development, was up-to-date and reviewed at the required intervals. There were effective processes to support and develop staff with additional roles and responsibilities. Staff discussed their learning needs, general wellbeing and aims for future professional development during annual appraisals and ongoing informal discussions. Staff stated they felt respected, supported and valued, and they were proud to work in the practice.

The practice had infection control procedures that reflected published guidance. Staff received appropriate training and demonstrated knowledge and awareness of infection prevention and control processes. We observed use of personal protective equipment and the decontamination of used dental instruments, which aligned with national guidance. We saw, and staff confirmed that single use items were not reprocessed. The practice had effective procedures to reduce the risk of Legionella, or other bacteria, developing in water systems, in line with a risk assessment. The practice had protocols to ensure effective cleaning and safe segregation and disposal of hazardous waste. The equipment in use was maintained and serviced as per manufacturers’ instructions. The practice completed infection prevention and control audits in line with current guidance. A quantity of unsealed (formerly blister packed) local anaesthetic ampules were seen in treatment room drawers. This shortfall has been addressed.

The judgement for Medicines optimisation is based on the latest evidence we assessed for the Safe key question.