• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Matilda Place

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Gordon Road, Winchester, SO23 7TD (01962) 866622

Provided and run by:
Alexander's Care & Support Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 17 May 2019

The inspection:

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection checked whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team:

The inspection was completed by two adult social care inspectors.

Service and service type:

• Matilda Place provides care and support to people living in two ‘extra care housing’ settings in the City of Winchester known as Matilda Place and Danemark Court. Extra care housing is purpose-built accommodation in a shared building or site. The accommodation was rented and was the occupant’s own home. People’s care and accommodation are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing. This inspection looked at people’s personal care and support service.

• The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided. They are referred to as the “registered manager” throughout the report.

• Before the inspection the commission had received some concerns regarding insufficient numbers of deployed staff to keep people safe. At the time of our inspection people using the service, staff and a relative we spoke with felt the service had sufficient numbers of staff deployed to ensure the safety and well-being of people.

Notice of inspection:

• We gave the service 24 hours’ notice of the inspection visit. We needed to be sure that people would be available to talk with us.

What we did before, during and following the inspection;

• Before the inspection we looked at information we held about the service.

• We used information the provider sent us in the Provider Information Return (PIR). This is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.

• We sought feedback from two health and social care professionals who worked with the service.

During the inspection:

• Inspection site visit activity started and ended on 24 April 2019. We visited the office location at Matilda Place.

• We visited both complexes where people received care and support.

• We reviewed staff recruitment, training and supervision records for four staff.

• We looked at records of accidents, incidents, complaints and compliments.

• We reviewed the care records and risk assessments for four people.

• We reviewed audits, quality assurance reports and surveys and staff attendance rosters.

• We spoke with the registered manager, manager and operations manager and five members of care staff.

• We also spoke with eight people living at the service and one relative.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 17 May 2019

About the service:

Matilda Place provides care and support to people living in two ‘extra care housing’ settings in the City of Winchester known as Matilda Place and Danemark Court so that they can live in their own self-contained flats as independently as possible.

Care and support was delivered to both older and younger people living with dementia, learning disabilities, physical disabilities and sensory impairment. The scheme is supported by The City of Winchester’s Sheltered and Extra Care Services.

People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support. At the time of our inspection 19 people living at Matilda Place and 26 people living at Danemark Court received personal care and support.

The service was supported by a registered manager, manager and 13 care staff.

People’s experience of using this service:

• People were protected from abuse, neglect and discrimination. Staff ensured people’s safety and acted when necessary to prevent any harm.

• Individual risks to people were assessed and managed to keep people safe.

• People requiring support with medicines received them as prescribed.

• The service was person centred and assessed people’s needs and individual preferences.

• People received care and support from staff who were trained sufficiently and had the right skills and knowledge which led to good outcomes for people.

• Staff had developed caring relationships with the people they supported. They respected people's dignity and privacy and promoted their independence.

• People's care and support met their needs and reflected their preferences.

• Health care professionals such as district nurses, the GP, and community mental health team had been involved in people’s care.

• People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

• People were supported to express their views and staff were knowledgeable about people’s preferred communication methods.

We observed many instances of genuine warmth between staff and people. On these occasions, staff took time to explain their actions in order to minimise people’s anxiety.

• Relatives and staff were very positive about the management of the service.

Rating at last inspection:

• This was our first inspection of Matilda Place which was registered with the Care Quality Commission on 5 June 2018.

Why we inspected:

• This was a planned inspection to check that this service was meeting the regulations and to give them a rating.

Follow up:

• We did not identify any concerns at this inspection. We will therefore re-inspect this service within our published timeframe for services rated good. We will continue to monitor the service through the information we receive.