The Dekeyser Group Practice had previously been inspected on 20 October 2016, where it had been rated as good overall.
We carried out an announced focused inspection of The Dekeyser Group Practice on 8 January 2020, following our annual review of the information available to use, including information provided by the practice. This inspection focused on the following key questions:
- are services effective
- are services responsive
- are services well-led.
Because of the assurance received from our review of information, we carried forward the ratings for the following key questions:
- are service safe (good)
- are services caring (good).
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We have rated this practice as good overall. We have rated responsive and all population groups as being requires improvement because:
-Patient satisfaction regarding how easy it was to get through to someone at the practice on the telephone was significantly below local and national averages.
-Patient satisfaction regarding their experience of making an appointment was below the local and national averages.
-Patients’ comments on CQC comment cards aligned with the above.
We found that:
- There were effective and comprehensive systems and processes in place to support good governance of the practice.
- Staff were aware of their roles and responsibilities. They were encouraged and supported with training and development opportunities, suitable for their individual roles.
- There was evidence of effective leadership and management. Leaders and managers had a good understanding of the challenges they faced regarding the provision of primary care services for their patient population. Staff reported there had been a positive cultural change.
- There was a range of risk assessments, data analysis and audit to support quality improvement. Any identified areas for improvement were acted upon.
- Staff were committed to providing high-quality accessible services.
- Patient comments were mixed about the service. All were positive about the care they received, the premises and how staff communicated with them. However, some patients commented negatively regarding telephone access. We were informed of the difficulties the practice had encountered with the telephone system and the changes they had subsequently made.
- The practice had introduced initiatives to support older and vulnerable patients accessing the service at their point of need.
The areas where the provider should make improvements are:
- Continue to monitor telephone access and improve patient satisfaction regarding this issue.
- Improve the system for filing correspondence and test results which have been acted upon.
- Improve and reduce the exception reporting relating to the Quality and Outcome Framework mental health indicators, to support patient care.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence table.
Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP
Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care