11 October 2023
During a routine inspection
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Torrington Park Group Practice on 11 October 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as requires improvement.
Safe - requires improvement.
Effective – good.
Caring – good.
Responsive - requires improvement.
Well-led - requires improvement.
During the inspection process, the practice highlighted efforts they are making to improve outcomes and treatment for their population. They had only recently been implemented and the effect of these efforts is not yet reflected in verified evidence. As such, the ratings for this inspection have not been impacted. However, we continue to monitor the data and where we see potential changes, we will follow these up with the practice.
Following our previous inspection on 1 September 2015, the practice was rated good overall and for all key questions.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Torrington Park Group Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
We carried out this inspection in line with our inspection priorities. We reviewed all key questions as part of this inspection.
How we carried out the inspection
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.
This included:
- Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- A short site visit.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We found that:
- Patients’ needs were assessed and the practice was generally prescribing safely, although improvements were needed in reviewing patients prescribed certain medicines and acting on safety alerts.
- Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs. The practice had a comprehensive programme of quality improvement activity and routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care provided.
- Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
- Data from the National GP Patient Survey (2023) showed that the practice was rated below local and national averages for questions relating to accessing the service. Although we saw the practice was attempting to improve access, this was not yet reflected in patient feedback.
- There was a strong emphasis on the well-being of staff.
- Although there were clear responsibilities, roles and systems for accountability, there were shortfalls in mitigating risks relating to disclosure and barring service checks and immunisation history for non-clinical staff.
We found breaches of regulations. The provider must:
- Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
In addition, the provider should:
- Continue to address all outstanding actions from the health and safety and fire safety risk assessments.
- Continue to improve the systems and processes to increase uptake for childhood immunisations and cervical screening.
- Improve the system for monitoring staff training.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Health Care