Updated 11 January 2019
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection checked whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team:
The inspection team consisted of two inspectors.
Service and service type
Shivas Home Care is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes. The agency supports eighteen people. Not everyone using Shivas Home care received the regulated activity; the Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection, nine people were receiving personal care.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided. The registered manager was also the registered provider.
Notice of inspection
We gave the service 24 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because it is a small service and the registered manager is often out of the office supporting staff or providing care. We needed to be sure that they would be in.
What we did:
We used information the provider sent us in the Provider Information Return. (PIR) This is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We looked at information we held about the service including notifications they had made to us about important events. We also reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection in June 2016. This included details about incidents the provider must notify us about, such as abuse and other information sent to us from other stakeholders for example the local authority and members of the public.
We spoke to three people using the service, three support workers, the registered manager / provider, three relatives and sought feedback from professionals who worked with the service.
We reviewed a range of records. This included three people's care records, two staff files around staff recruitment and supervision and the training records for all staff. We also reviewed records relating to the management of the home and a variety of policies and procedures developed and implemented by the provider.